Europe’s satellite industry finds itself at a crossroads, courtesy of the United States’ head start led by Elon Musk’s SpaceX and its Starlink system. Eutelsat’s recent merger with OneWeb and the hefty €1.35 billion investment by the French government symbolize a sincere push to foster a European alternative. However, despite these efforts, the region’s satellite broadband ambitions remain a David-versus-Goliath story, underscored by structural, financial, and technological hurdles that few are willing to confront honestly.
The line between commercial enterprise and strategic state interest is increasingly blurred for Eutelsat. France’s move to take a near-30% stake marks a pivotal shift: from seeing satellite communication solely as a telco business to recognizing it as a critical infrastructure with geopolitical weight. This reflects the broader European desire for technological sovereignty, but turning political will into a competitive, viable rival to Starlink is a massively complex endeavor.
The Glaring Disparity in Scale and Investment
Starlink’s edge isn’t simply about tech innovation; it’s the sheer scale and speed of its deployment. While Eutelsat’s merged OneWeb fleet boasts roughly 650 low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites, SpaceX commands over 7,600—more than ten times as many. This quantitative gap explains much about service reach, latency, and user capacity, placing Eutelsat in a perpetual catch-up mode.
One might argue that quality or strategy could compensate for quantity, but industry experts are resolutely skeptical. The fact that OneWeb’s existing satellites are aging and slated for replacement underscores the tough reality: before Eutelsat can dream of growth, it must first sustain and modernize its fleet. Meanwhile, SpaceX continues expanding aggressively and refining second- and third-generation satellites, capitalizing on rapid launch capabilities unmatched in the Old Continent.
This leads to the inevitable question: how long can Europe afford to play catch-up while the U.S. solidifies its dominance? The disparity isn’t merely commercial—it’s strategic, particularly as the future of military, governmental, and critical infrastructure communications increasingly rely on reliable, secure satellite networks.
Europe’s Structural Weaknesses: Lagging Launch and Manufacturing
It’s not just the amount of capital that’s an issue; Europe’s satellite ecosystem suffers from deeper, systemic disadvantages. The continent’s launch capabilities remain limited and heavily dependent on U.S. services, ironically often relying on SpaceX itself—an uncomfortable dependency for anyone serious about autonomy. This vulnerability is more than theoretical; it influences decision-making, geopolitical leverage, and reliability of access in conflict situations or crises.
Manufacturing throughput lags behind, too. The rapid pace of SpaceX’s satellite production and deployment is a key factor that Europe’s industry finds hard to replicate, given the fragmented nature of its aerospace sector and regulatory complexity.
Compounding these challenges is spectrum management and terminal availability. Starlink’s holistic approach—combining constellation density, ground infrastructure, and spectrum efficiency—has created a near-moat around its market. Eutelsat’s constellation architecture, utilizing a bent-pipe system rather than Starlink’s more sophisticated designs, compromises performance and flexibility.
A Strategic Niche or Genuine Global Challenger?
France and the broader EU’s ambition isn’t entirely misguided. Eutelsat’s positioning may not aim to dethrone Starlink outright but to cultivate niches where sovereignty, security, and jurisdictional control trump sheer network scale. Government and enterprise clients in Europe, for instance, may prioritize these factors significantly more than the general consumer market, where cost and availability drive adoption.
This focus on “dual-use” applications—both commercial and defense-related—may carve out a defensible space for Eutelsat, but the company must clearly acknowledge that competing head-to-head with Starlink on mass-market broadband is currently a pipe dream. The pause at replacing aging satellites alone restricts meaningful expansion in the near term.
The Ukrainian experience—where Starlink has been the primary provider amid contested U.S.-Ukraine relations and Germany’s attempts to deploy Eutelsat terminals—illustrates the geopolitical implications and operational lag. Eutelsat’s inability to cover the same connectivity footprint demonstrates the distance still to travel.
Why Europe’s Overreliance on State Intervention Is a Double-Edged Sword
The French government’s huge financial injection is laudable as a political statement of intent but also a reflection of Europe’s difficulty in mobilizing private capital for space ventures that are risky and capital-intensive. This reliance on state intervention risks two intertwined pitfalls: bureaucratic paralysis and misallocation of resources.
Historically, state-led initiatives can suffer from slower decision-making and softer market discipline. While stepping in to safeguard strategic assets has merit, it must not come at the expense of agility and innovation. Jean-Francois Fallacher’s appointment as CEO, replacing Eva Berneke, signals a desire to inject telecom commercial acumen, but the challenge remains imposing.
Moreover, no amount of state money will substitute for the scale, risk tolerance, and visionary leadership that Musk’s SpaceX embodies. Europe’s fragmented aerospace sector and regulatory environment can hinder rapid scaling, creating a drag that simple investment injections can’t resolve.
—
Europe’s satellite broadband future depends on a clear-eyed view of its limitations and a surgical focus on leveraging its unique strengths. Trying to imitate Starlink without matching its scope and speed is a fool’s errand. But carving out spaces where sovereignty, enterprise-grade security, and regulatory jurisdiction matter is a valid—and perhaps prudent—strategy, provided Europe accepts that this path is about pragmatic coexistence, not supremacy.